An environmental project uses $120,000 to fund 3 tasks: sensors, delivery, and training. Sensors cost twice delivery, and training costs $10,000 less than delivery. How much goes to sensors? - Databee Business Systems
How $120,000 Was Allocated to a Green Initiative — Sensors Got $60,000
How $120,000 Was Allocated to a Green Initiative — Sensors Got $60,000
A recent environmental project successfully secured $120,000 in funding to advance sustainable monitoring efforts. The budget was divided across three core tasks: sensor deployment, delivery of equipment, and staff training — each carefully planned to maximize ecological impact.
Budget Breakdown: Sensors, Delivery, and Training
According to project leaders, the allocation follows a logical cost distribution:
- Sensors received twice the funding of delivery.
- Training cost $10,000 less than delivery.
- Total spending reached exactly $120,000.
Understanding the Context
Let’s Solve the Problem
Let delivery cost = D
Then, sensors cost = 2D
And training = D – $10,000
Setting up the equation:
D + 2D + (D – 10,000) = 120,000
Combining terms:
4D – 10,000 = 120,000
Add 10,000 to both sides:
4D = 130,000
Divide by 4:
D = 32,500
Now calculate sensors:
Sensors cost = 2D = 2 × 32,500 = $60,000
Thus, $60,000 was allocated to sensors — a critical component enabling precise environmental data collection across the project’s monitoring sites.
Key Insights
This balanced spending supports a transparent, effective approach to ecological stewardship. Sensors play a key role in ensuring accurate, real-time insights, helping guide future conservation strategies efficiently.
Keywords: environmental project, $120,000 budget, sensors funding, delivery cost, training expenses, eco-monitoring, project allocation, sustainability finance
